Learn How to Read Meat Labels
What Meat Label Claims Mean, Why They Differ, and What’s Missing
Meat labels are full of claims—humanely raised, no antibiotics, grass-fed, Product of USA.
Some of these claims provide real information. Others provide only partial information. Many sound similar but are treated very differently under U.S. law.
The purpose of Farm Animal Transparency (FAT) is to help consumers learn what meat labels actually tell you—and what they do not.
This Learn section explains the most common label claims in plain language and shows how FAT evaluates them using a partial-credit approach based on information quality and verification.
Why Meat Labels Are Hard to Compare
There is no single standard for most meat label claims.
Some claims are reviewed or approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Some rely on producer records or affidavits.
Some are backed by independent certification programs.
Others are simply descriptive language allowed as long as it is not misleading.
As a result, two products can carry the same claim while conveying very different amounts of information.
FAT does not treat claims as simply true or false. Instead, FAT evaluates how much useful, verifiable information a claim provides.
How FAT Evaluates Label Claims
For every major claim, FAT asks three questions:
What information does this claim actually disclose?
How is that information supported or verified?
What important context is missing?
Claims earn more credit when they are:
clearly defined,
independently verified,
and transparent about scope and limitations.
Claims earn less credit when they are vague, undocumented, or legally redundant.
This approach reflects how labeling actually works in practice—and avoids treating complex production decisions as simple yes/no choices.
Start With a Topic
Each page below explains one major category of label claims, using the same framework FAT applies on the website and in the FAT App.
Animal Welfare
What humanely raised and animal welfare certified actually mean, why certifications differ, and why the same claim can represent very different practices across species.
→ Learn about Animal Welfare labels
Antibiotics
What No Antibiotics Ever and related claims mean, how treatment exceptions work, and why verification matters.
→ Learn about Antibiotic claims
Hormones
When hormone claims are meaningful, when they are legally redundant, and how beef differs from poultry and pork.
→ Learn about Hormone claims
Grass-Fed
Why grass-fed does not always mean grass-finished, how verification varies, and why origin matters.
→ Learn about Grass-Fed claims
Country of Origin
Why Product of USA can be confusing, how origin claims are regulated, and what labels often leave out.
→ Learn about Country-of-Origin claims
Want the Evidence Behind the Explanations?
Each explainer links to FAT Research papers that examine the underlying science, regulation, and market practices in detail. These papers are written for readers who want to see how USDA rules work, how certification programs differ, and why FAT assigns partial credit where it does.
How This Connects to FAT Scores and the FAT App
The same logic explained here is used:
in FAT product reviews,
in FAT label scores,
and in the FAT App when you scan a product.
If you ever wonder “Why did this claim score the way it did?”—the answer starts here.
Bottom line
Meat labels are not meaningless—but they are incomplete.
Learning how to interpret them is the first step toward real transparency.